Monday, March 20, 2006

Artful dodgers

The latest count says there are 8,000 deserters listed with the United States Armed Forces since 2003, a strange statistic given the fact that the draft was last used in 1973, which is 33 years ago in case you don't have your calculator handy. Here are some of the reasons given by those daring enough to come forward and make a statement. If you'll notice, I said "daring" enough, I didn't say "courageous". Courage is a term reserved for a category of people that military deserters do not belong to, whatever their reasoning for doing what they have done. In any case, let's review some of their reasons (you can google them quite easily if you don't trust me reprinting them here):

"The Army didn't tell me I'd have to adopt their belief structure". No, of course they didn't. And if you end up working for Netscape, they won't mind if you tell everyone you know about the merits of Microsoft, either.
"I'm a conscientious objector". Funny, three months ago on page 5 of your enlistment contract you failed to check that block. What happened? And by the way, the war started in 2003 and you enlisted in 2004. Helllloooooo?!?
"My recruiter didn't mention anything about being deployed to Iraq." This excuse is of course believable, since the entire Gulf War II has been a secret that no one knew about until last month.
"I came in for the $50,000.00 college fund." Riiiight. Well here is the deal thunder head, they don't give you that money. It's called a trade-off, or something earned for something given.
"This war is illegal as far as I'm concerned." This is the one most commonly used after conscientious objector. I think people who can't use an ATM machine should be declared legally stupid as far as I'm concerned, but you know what? They won't be declared legally stupid any more than this war will be declared illegal to fight. In any event, please let us know when a 'legal war' comes about that you're willing to fight in, and we'll call you. In the meantime, I'll just go to another bank.

C'mon folks, it doesn't matter how you feel about the war or whether you're in the military or not...deserting the Armed Forces is one of the most despicable things a person in this country can do. And here is the real irony - the very reason you can even try and pull off some crap like this - is because of the millions of men and women who have died in wars in the past to make and keep this a free democratic society. I think it's monumentally sad that a young man or woman can freely enter the armed forces, get a barrel-full of college money or up to $75,000.00 in college loan forgiveness, get paid a decent salary every month, and the moment they're called upon to do what they're trained to do - they bail. Hey Jimmy Deserter-boy, every time you went to the field, they made you carry your M-16 rifle 24/7, right? Did you think that was because you might get a chance one day to nail a scurrying squirell? They conducted war games in the field and at places like the National Training Center in the Mojave desert in California. You were there, remember? War games. Drop the 'games' part, and insert only the 1st word. That's correct Jimmy...the word is 'war'.

How does your "my recruiter didn't tell me" logic apply when there are those of us out here in the civilian sector that know better? How come you weren't conscientiously objecting at the bank every month when you deposited your paycheck? Have you mentioned the training with the weapons, the paychecks, and the terminology like 'war-gaming' to your lawyer in Canada?

No? I didn't think so. That would take courage.

7 comments:

Wisdom Weasel said...

They should have done what all the truly REMF-inclined do and joined the air force.

JL4 said...

Indeed...nice to see someone who knows what a REMF is

Sean said...

a subject that is close to my heart. and where to begin? it'd be great if we could ask serious questions when recruiting, maybe give a mental fitness exam or two. but that'd drastically reduce the pool of qualified candidates. and recruiters are under the gun to meet numbers. what people don't realize is i could do a helluva lot more with less, as long as the "less" was quality.

get some real pay going, some competitive salary so that a guy doesn't feel like he has to leave the service to give his family a decent quality of life. give HONEST evaluation reports. work hard to retain the good guys. not everyone. the good guys. recruit people we actually want, that we actually think we'd trust to cover our backs someday (did i mention that my battle buddy in basic was retarded? seriously? he got a waiver for having such a low g.t. score because he was willing to go into graves registration or mortuary affairs or whatever that m.o.s. is), do away with the seperate pays for single vs. married people. it'd be nice if people understood that soldiers are the real weapons, and poor real money at personnel issues and health care instead of fancy guns and planes and vehicles that are marginally better than what we have. instead of a gun that shoots around corners and has 6000 moving parts and electronics that can be damaged on a jump and needs batteries that i have to carry and that can fail on me, why not just teach recruits how to shoot? and get rid of the ones who can't? but no, we'll put so much pressure on drill sergeants to have high numbers of graduating students that they help the students cheat to get past b.r.m. just like we put so much pressure on recruiters that they'll tell recruits to lie about injuries, background and beliefs just to get them in the door.

quit giving me ibuprofen when i complain about knee and shoulder problems. fix the problems. sure, i know you see tons of people who come to sick call just to get out of work. but i'm not one of them. how about getting rid of the shirkers? i'm sure their performance is lacking in enough places that if people were doing honest counseling and if the red tape were cleared up so we could eject the slack-asses easier that there wouldn't be a problem getting rid of them. and the docs could realize i've got legitimate complaints.

blah. good post. i agree these guys are oxygen thieves, but i think it's a symptom of much bigger, much uglier, much more serious problems under the surface. sure there's the question of why'd they join in the first place (did you NEVER see stripes? platoon? heartbreak ridge? the big read one? to hell and back? black hawk down? hell, even pauly shore's "in the army now"? how can you NOT know what you were getting into?), but i think the bigger question is how'd they get in?

leelee said...

Hey, my father was in the AF in WWII.

He was a hero and served with honor and dignity.

PS: I know what REMF..consider me dissed!

JL4 said...

The AF folks in WWII were far from REMF's...that stuff started in Vietnam...

Now we have the Armed Forces AND the Air Force

Wisdom Weasel said...

My father just retired from 40 years in the Royal Air Force- moving from 16 year old apprentice to Squadron Leader and serving all over the globe in the interim. I still like to bust the air forces of the world for what has become a cushy little number; how many planes have been lost in combat since GW1 compared to the number of splatted ground pounders?

In reality, the chance of anyone out of the spearhead finding themselves in harm's way these days is remote (and that would be the majority of those serving in the US armed forces). And in truth, as Iraq has shown, while the contributions of combat and combat-support units are invaluable the real need is for what Thomas Barnett calls "sys admin" troops- namely REMFs who are able to deploy with their special skills (power & light, policing, medical, etc) in suffcient numbers after the initial shooting war is over. The Green Berets understand this and have multi-skilled troopers in their teams; why the regular army can't grasp the concept is beyond me.

Although to be sure, they are all "heroes" as soon as they put on a uniform, even the guy sitting in Topeka putting together the unit newsletter. I suppose this sort of grade inflation means people who actually do something that meets the traditional definition of heroic is a "super hero"....

leelee said...

OK..thanks for elaborating..consider me no longer dissed.

:-)